Today's hottest deals

Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory124.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '18 at 14:04
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6130
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 824
75% 628 Pts
64-Core 3,809
236% 3,809 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 137
Parallax 163
104% 143 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 157
Splatting 114
105% 130 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
2TB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 509
Write 401
Mixed 423
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 26.4
84% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 112
119% 200 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 82%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,808
Write 1,357
Mixed 1,251
326% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 17.3
76% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 67.9
94% 160 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 187%
Great: 302%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$196
7.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 176
Mixed 166
130% 173 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.49
127% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$196
7.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 162
Mixed 161
121% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$196
7.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 140
108% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.52
132% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$196
7.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 180
Mixed 176
135% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.52
136% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 72ASS8G72LZ-2G6B2 2x31.5GB
2 of 12 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 10.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback