Intel MAHOBAY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel MAHOBAY  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '18 at 15:11
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 137
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 172
25% 182 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.15 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
448GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61% Good
Read 99.3
Write 113
Mixed 123
85% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.27
75% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 64.1
Mixed 58.1
48% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.43
182% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung F6451U64F9333G 08B6 MD3512NSA-HA3G1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 14.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAHOBAY Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel MAHOBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback