Today's hottest deals

MSI Z97S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7922)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7922
MotherboardMSI Z97S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7922)  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 01 '18 at 06:10
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 657
68% 547 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 3063) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 31.5
20% 26.9 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 25.6
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 404
Mixed 424
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 42.4
154% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 21.6
86% 195 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 129%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
590GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 94.6
Mixed 103
76% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.26
85% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 100%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
18GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 57
Write 71.4
Mixed 65.2
49% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 59%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
10GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 97
Mixed 67.3
67% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.29
88% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991776 (998776) 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7922) Builds (Compare 2,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7922) - $127

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $775
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback