Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Compaq-presario NR001AA-ABZ CQ5024IT (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON NARRA5
Memory	0.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090219
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '18 at 20:32
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	85%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ 5,372 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 55.2 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 47.3 32% 45.7 Pts	4-Core 45.9 8-Core 67.6 7% 56.8 Pts	64-Core 74 5% 74 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 1613) 512MB Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.29% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.44 1% 1.79 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.32 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.29% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 916GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2O Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 125 Write 119 Mixed 147 99% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.15 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.12 29% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 107%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 28GB free, PID 0059 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	4.67% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 6.28 Mixed 6.07 10% 9.42 MB/s	4K Read 4.17 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.004 16% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.67% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM