Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140620
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 10 '18 at 23:07
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 517
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 6.62
3% 5.96 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 7.65
5% 5.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 493
Write 348
Mixed 336
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 23.8
132% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 42.5
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 19.8
46% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
33GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 55
Write 48
Mixed 50.2
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.27
68% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 57%
WDC WD25 00BEVT-22ZCT0 250GB
129GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20% Poor
Read 37.1
Write 40.8
Mixed 17
39% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.29
74% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 12.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback