MSI H61M-E22/W8 (MS-7788)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7788
MotherboardMSI H61M-E22/W8 (MS-7788)  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130314
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 13 '18 at 21:02
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G465
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Memory 40
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 33.6
24% 33.9 Pts
4-Core 35
8-Core 39
5% 37 Pts
64-Core 56.7
4% 56.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
MSI(1462 7788) 768MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.84
1% 0.98 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 117
Write 121
Mixed 85.8
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.55
107% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-E22/W8 (MS-7788) Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-E22/W8 (MS-7788)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback