Asus N53Jq

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus N53Jq (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N53Jq
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101105
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '18 at 03:09
Run Duration	489 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 80.6 1-Core 57.2 2-Core 99.1 51% 79 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 141 20% 145 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M 3,013 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1522) 1GB CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.28 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.65% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 3.44 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 3.33 Splatting 2.43 3% 3.48 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.65% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 81 44934578 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4589 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 19 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 404798990 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 17787 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4570 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 29467 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065730 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 55 588578847 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 191 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 113 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 378584 (C2) HDA temperature 31 45 30064771103 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 49 39 44934578 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 7 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 7 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0
Poor: 9% Great: 43%
WDC WD20 03FYYS-02W0B1 2TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 292GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 85 Write 80.7 Mixed 18 72% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.04 4K Write 2.64 4K Mixed 0.42 108% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 55%
SanDisk SDSSDA240G 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 207GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	91.5% Outstanding	Read 127 Write 99.6 Mixed 94.9 132% 107 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 3.5 700% 9.93 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 24 DQ Mixed 5.22 1,048% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 114%
WDC WD10 03FBYX-01Y7B1 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 75GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 108 Write 87.9 Mixed 63.5 105% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.19 4K Write 2.64 4K Mixed 0.46 110% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 55%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 32GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 29GB free, PID 4060 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	9.61% Terrible	Read 18 Write 13.5 Mixed 12.7 18% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.96 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.89 78% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.61% Great: 17%
HUA72101 0KLA330 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 19GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 74.2 Write 72.8 Mixed 45.2 80% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.39 77% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 32%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 17GB free, PID 0740 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 64.3 Write 67.3 Mixed 15.8 59% 49.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.12 52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 41%
HUA72101 0KLA330 1TB 17GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.8% Poor	Read 62.8 Write 51.4 Mixed 36.6 61% 50.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.31 61% 0.74 MB/s

HUA72105 0KLA330 500GB 11GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.1% Poor	Read 50 Write 48.2 Mixed 11.8 43% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.31 70% 0.91 MB/s

WDC WD10 02FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 69.5 Write 66.9 Mixed 20.4 62% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.41 86% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 802C 8KTF51264HZ-1G9E5 0D9B 802C 8KTF51264HZ-1G9E5 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.5% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 10.9 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N53Jq Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N53Jq

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	42x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	2x
Core i7 X 940Intel $150Bench 60%, 592 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples	45x

SSD
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	5x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	4x
480GB SATA SSD 480GBPNYBench 80%, 729 samples	3x

RAM
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	5x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 3x2GBAsintBench 36%, 71 samples	4x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353