Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-603

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-603  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-603
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '16 at 10:49
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 45.3
30% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 78.7
8-Core 79.3
11% 79 Pts
64-Core 84.3
5% 84.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 085E) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 1
1% 1.01 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
775GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 129
Write 123
Mixed 120
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.21
109% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 109%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
8GB free, PID 0054
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 6.42
Mixed 9.41
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.53
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.006
10% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-603 Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-603

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback