Asus M51AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '18 at 09:46
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 144
59% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 223
26% 201 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.8% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 61.3
58% 68 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 68.4
54% 65.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 402
Mixed 420
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 47.8
174% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 115
144% 258 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 113%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
747GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 154
Mixed 142
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.22
91% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.5% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback