Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '18 at 22:15
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 118
56% 89 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 190
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 27.1
22% 26.1 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 29.7
22% 25.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$34
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 242
Write 234
Mixed 204
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 3.93
49% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 28
DQ Mixed 2.91
9% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MK1637GSX 160GB-$4
97GB free
Firmware: DL032C Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 40
Mixed 39.8
30% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.24
70% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5595-001.A00LF 99U5471-056.A00LF 10GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback