Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 22:05
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 103
50% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 229
25% 199 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 32.3
28% 30.4 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 32.2
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 115 142 145 155 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 61.3
Write 96.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 133
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
67% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 8GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback