Today's hottest deals

Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140220
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 02 '18 at 18:12
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 170
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 305
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 17
Parallax 20
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 80 85 84 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.5% Above average
Read 238
Write 114
Mixed 154
SusWrite 84.3
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 28.4
124% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 26
34% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
85GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 136 132 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 111
Write 77.5
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 134
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$7
20GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 145
Write 96.3
Mixed 108
141% 116 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4.4
292% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 39%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
102GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 98 99 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 134
Write 133
Mixed 100
SusWrite 98.8
156% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 6,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback