Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 Gaming K6 (all builds)
Memory	54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161103
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '19 at 15:47
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 76.7 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 198 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 775 69% 586 Pts	64-Core 766 47% 766 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 169 Parallax 186 144% 177 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 151 Splatting 109 117% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,799 Write 550 Mixed 599 213% 983 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 93.1 4K Mixed 48.6 169% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 890 DQ Write 502 DQ Mixed 749 543% 714 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 8GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 370 Write 331 Mixed 332 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 48.7 161% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 247 187% 252 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Glyph StudioRAID TB2 4TB 2.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 340 354 372 377 371 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	206% Outstanding	Read 364 Write 358 Mixed 66 SusWrite 353 206% 285 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 1.1 300% 2.57 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2800 C14 4x16GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	67.9% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 21 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 30.1 SC Mixed 10.8 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 87 46% 87 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	370x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	79x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	69x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	107x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	95x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	78x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	37x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	34x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	26x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $488

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16