Lenovo 80RU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80RU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo ideapad 700-15ISK
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151208
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '17 at 16:56
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 175
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 547
55% 449 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 380A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4463
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Lighting 5.83
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 5.12
5% 9.05 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 11.3
7% 7.68 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900NS38 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 481
Write 111
Mixed 140
53% 244 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 12
70% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 79.6
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 29.6
42% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
549GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 97
Mixed 92.7
71% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.25
79% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR2133S464L15/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.4% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 20.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 14.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80RU Builds (Compare 1,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80RU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback