Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2020.

Average Bench: 81.8% (68th of 132)

Based on 319 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GB
Poor: 68%Average: 81.8% Great: 90%

Popular builds with this RAM

Very good average bench

The Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GB averaged just 18.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 32.4GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 32.1GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GB is 21.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 16.1GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 81.9ns

Average Bench

(Based on 319 samples)
Rank 6881.8%
Min Avg Max
23.6 MC Read 30.1 33.5
26.4 MC Write 32.4 35.1
22.7 MC Mixed 26.2 28.4
84.5% 29.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
10.3 SC Read 16.1 19.6
20.5 SC Write 32.1 38
15.4 SC Mixed 23.7 28
68.6% 24 GB/s
Min Avg Max
64.4 Latency 81.9 118
48.8% 81.9 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 29.5
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 26.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.6
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 26
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
76.9% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 24.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
76.5% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.8
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 23.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
76.1% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 24.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 27
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 15.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
74.2% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 23.2
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 24.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
69.5% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
47.4% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 19
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
319 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,199,664 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GB Builds (Compare 4,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 15 9570

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples3,851x
Core i9-8950HKIntelBench 74%, 14,729 samples652x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples278x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples3,003x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 25%, 10,407 samples1,643x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples58x
SSD
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples560x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples488x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba  $30Bench 145%, 33,719 samples478x
RAM
CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GBCrucialBench 82%, 319 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback