Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 04:47
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 235
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 474
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1265) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 32.7
27% 32.4 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 21.1
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 460 459 446 378 453 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 456
Mixed 418
SusWrite 440
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 48.3
160% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 344
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
SABRENT 128GB
37GB free
Firmware: 1214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 40 41 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.1% Very poor
Read 40.4
Write 40.9
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 40.6
9% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 12
39% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 15.3
12% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 75%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB
28GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 7.2 8 8.3 6.1 8.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15
Write 5.2
SusWrite 7.3
10% 9.17 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 28.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-53 Builds (Compare 2,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback