Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

G.SKILL F4-4000C18D-32GVK

Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2021.

Average Bench: 94.5% (31st of 132)

Based on 5,610 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-4000C18-16GVK 2x16GB
Poor: 70%Average: 94.5% Great: 124%

Popular builds with this RAM

Excellent average bench

The G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB averaged just 5.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 39.3GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 33.1GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB is 54.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 71.6ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 24.8GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 5,610 samples)
Rank 3194.5%
Min Avg Max
27.8 MC Read 39.3 59.3
19.8 MC Write 30.1 47.6
22 MC Mixed 32.3 41.3
96.9% 33.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15.3 SC Read 24.8 31.2
18.4 SC Write 28.9 50.3
21.2 SC Mixed 33.1 42
82.6% 28.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
48.5 Latency 71.6 93.7
55.9% 71.6 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
111% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 42.2
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 42.3
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
110% Outstanding
MC Read 49.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 41.6
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 42.9
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
104% Outstanding
MC Read 54.1
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 30.5
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 29.7
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 38.3
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 39.1
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 35.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 41.8
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 31.5
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 30
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 23.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 24.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 24.3
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
5,610 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,222,788 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB Builds (Compare 26,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $146Bench 86%, 635,419 samples4,797x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $155Bench 98%, 89,263 samples4,414x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples3,536x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples2,320x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $709Bench 187%, 424,051 samples2,143x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples1,523x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $100Bench 310%, 455,997 samples1,903x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $113Bench 385%, 327,441 samples1,139x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $100Bench 297%, 331,647 samples893x
RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 95%, 5,610 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $836

Popular Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback