Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210122
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 16:00
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 862
80% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,228
76% 1,228 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 69.4
58% 72.2 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 67.1
56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 339 331 320 304 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 478
Write 312
Mixed 361
SusWrite 321
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 34.3
102% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 133%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
588GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1429 795 807 827 820 826 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,540
Write 1,854
Mixed 1,424
SusWrite 917
323% 1434 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 59.9
194% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,325
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 1,137
850% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 229%
Great: 276%
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3051 3274 3265 3176 3113 3293 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 1,676
Write 2,381
Mixed 1,991
SusWrite 3,195
526% 2,311 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 53.6
161% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 882
DQ Mixed 1,115
819% 1,081 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 360%
Great: 516%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
37GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 115 112 112 113 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 120
Write 121
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 113
69% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 140 137 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 65.5
Write 96.4
Mixed 104
SusWrite 138
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
372% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 27.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 25.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 VSC6832 VA2759 Series
Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback