Average Bench: 180% (7th of 132)

Based on 878 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C30 2x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C30 2x16GB averaged 80.0% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C30 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 73.9GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 65.8GB/s

Very poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C30 2x16GB is 71.3%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C30 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 68.6ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 38.2GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 878 samples)
Min Avg Max
53.8 MC Read 73.9 86.3
50.9 MC Write 65.2 77.3
50.4 MC Mixed 65.8 75.7
195% 68.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
18.6 SC Read 38.2 65.2
44 SC Write 54.5 67
26.5 SC Mixed 43.4 64
130% 45.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
45.3 Latency 68.6 91.8
58.3% 68.6 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 91
MC Write 65.7
MC Mixed 73.2
219% 76.6 GB/s
SC Read 64
SC Write 61.9
SC Mixed 63.1
180% 63 GB/s
Latency 44.3
90% 44.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 87.2
MC Write 68.3
MC Mixed 74
218% 76.5 GB/s
SC Read 54.3
SC Write 58.2
SC Mixed 59.5
164% 57.3 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 83.7
MC Write 76.8
MC Mixed 74.8
224% 78.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 56.3
SC Mixed 35.2
112% 39.1 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 69.6
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 64.8
191% 66.8 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 30.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 66.4
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 55.5
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 51.4
SC Write 48.4
SC Mixed 51.6
144% 50.5 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 50.6
147% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 47.2
SC Write 57.9
SC Mixed 49.7
147% 51.6 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
878 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,417,415 RAM Kits tested

Typical CMH32GX5M2B6000C30 2x16GB Builds (Compare 9,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $205

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,452

Popular CMH32GX5M2B6000C30 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback