Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 289%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics255% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock X670E Steel Legend  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Steel Legend
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 03:59
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$441
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 197
2-Core 385
120% 226 Pts
4-Core 749
8-Core 1,254
122% 1,001 Pts
64-Core 1,773
110% 1,773 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Lighting 342
Reflection 470
Parallax 697
278% 503 fps
MRender 482
Gravity 234
Splatting 450
322% 389 fps
Poor: 176%
This bench: 255%
Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2681 945 952 949 953 957 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 2,868
Write 3137
Mixed 2,891
SusWrite 1,239
570% 2,534 MB/s
4K Read 73.3
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 94.9
309% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,584
DQ Write 1,245
DQ Mixed 1,404
1,053% 1,411 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 350%
Great: 429%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
244GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 480
Mixed 388
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 40.6
154% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 320
244% 329 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 99%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
926GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 512
Write 494
Mixed 419
106% 475 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 49.6
179% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 369
278% 370 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$320
2.5TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 518
Write 492
Mixed 470
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 62.3
212% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 137%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
365GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,508
Write 1,670
Mixed 1,623
428% 1,934 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 94.1
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,634
DQ Write 1,310
DQ Mixed 1,440
1,086% 1,461 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
ASolid USB 32GB
24GB free, PID 205a
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 26.5
Mixed 55.3
68% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.2
140% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C30 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
213% Outstanding
MC Read 80.7
MC Write 69.6
MC Mixed 80.6
220% 77 GB/s
SC Read 68.2
SC Write 71.7
SC Mixed 66.1
196% 68.7 GB/s
Latency 47.1
85% 47.1 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 213%
Great: 213%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2724 XG27WQ
Typical X670E Steel Legend Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $2,366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback