Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Unknown

CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 029E0000802C CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 48GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2024.

Average Bench: 133% (17th of 132)

Based on 3 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 029E0000802C CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 48GB
Poor: 130%Average: 133% Great: 135%

Popular builds with this RAM

Outstanding average bench

The Unknown CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 029E0000802C CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 48GB averaged 33.1% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 029E0000802C CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 48GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 52.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 51.9GB/s

Unknown consistency

There are too few samples to reasonably determine how consistently this RAM perfroms. This result should be interpreted with caution.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 97.3ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 19.3GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 3 samples)
Rank 17133%
Min Avg Max
51.1 MC Read 51.9 52.5
50.8 MC Write 52.2 53.3
48.8 MC Mixed 49.1 49.2
146% 51.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
18.2 SC Read 19.3 19.9
44.4 SC Write 46.4 47.7
26.7 SC Mixed 28.8 30.2
89.9% 31.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
94.9 Latency 97.3 100
41.1% 97.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
135% Outstanding
MC Read 52.5
MC Write 53.3
MC Mixed 49.2
148% 51.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 47.7
SC Mixed 30.2
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
134% Outstanding
MC Read 52
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 49.2
146% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 47
SC Mixed 29.4
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
130% Outstanding
MC Read 51.1
MC Write 50.8
MC Mixed 48.8
144% 50.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 26.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,293,704 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 029E0000802C CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 48GB Builds (Compare 3,945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

System: Dell XPS 8950

CPU
Core i7-12700IntelBench 108%, 25,535 samples1,862x
Core i9-12900KIntel  $277Bench 117%, 66,991 samples841x
Core i7-12700KIntel  $214Bench 114%, 133,111 samples811x
GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $399Bench 128%, 442,467 samples1,286x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $730Bench 187%, 424,051 samples544x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples513x
SSD
PM9A1 Samsung 512GBNvmeBench 278%, 3,082 samples440x
PM9A1 Samsung 1024GBNvmeBench 322%, 5,261 samples352x
PC801 SK hynix 1TBNvmeBench 351%, 3,744 samples341x
RAM
CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 029E0000802C CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 48GBUnknownBench 133%, 3 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $399

Popular CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 029E0000802C CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 48GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Just released
Age: 8 months

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback