Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Apacer

78.CAGQC.4020B 2x8GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2019.

Average Bench: 74.6% (88th of 132)

Based on 18 user benchmarks.  Model: Apacer 78.CAGQC.4020B 2x8GB
Poor: 68%Average: 74.6% Great: 87%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Apacer 78.CAGQC.4020B 2x8GB averaged 25.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 28.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 27.1GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Apacer 78.CAGQC.4020B 2x8GB is just 18.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Apacer 78.CAGQC.4020B 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 86.8ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 19.6GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 18 samples)
Rank 8874.6%
Min Avg Max
22.7 MC Read 28.2 35.6
21.2 MC Write 27.1 32.1
18.2 MC Mixed 25 30.8
76.4% 26.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
14.3 SC Read 19.6 23.7
17.4 SC Write 26.2 32.5
14.1 SC Mixed 22 25.8
64.5% 22.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59.8 Latency 86.8 147
46.1% 86.8 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
78.2% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 24
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
77.4% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 26.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 23.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
76.9% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 26.1
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 23.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
72.5% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 26.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
69.9% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
56% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
18 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,296,308 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 78.CAGQC.4020B 2x8GB Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: CMS 7200-5503A

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel  $110Bench 80%, 34,310 samples9x
Core i7-9700KIntel  $240Bench 97%, 550,833 samples2x
Core i5-9600KIntel  $130Bench 93%, 321,194 samples2x
GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia  $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples9x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples2x
GTX 570Nvidia  $350Bench 20%, 22,303 samples1x
SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples2x
ssd 512GBBench 73%, 4,609 samples2x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples2x
RAM
78.CAGQC.4020B 2x8GBApacerBench 75%, 18 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $319

Popular 78.CAGQC.4020B 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback