Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 2,214 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 118 2-Core 216 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 547 55% 444 Pts	64-Core 593 37% 593 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB; radean rx 570 CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Lighting 62 Reflection 63.6 Parallax 84.6 50% 70.1 fps	MRender 63.1 Gravity 60.3 Splatting 52.2 47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0922A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 5030 Write 42.7 Mixed 84.5 357% 1,719 MB/s	4K Read 412 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 5.6 633% 140 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 99%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 155GB free Firmware: SBFK61K1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 473 Write 171 Mixed 336 72% 327 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 35.8 142% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 185 167% 251 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB 4,891 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 418GB free Firmware: GL001U Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 66.3 Write 59.7 Mixed 21.5 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 78.CAGQC.4020B 2x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 30.8 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 24.2 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	11x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $71Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	9x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	8x

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $221