Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 73.3% (90th of 132)

Based on 10 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB
Poor: 28%Average: 73.3% Great: 93%

Good average bench

The Kingston 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB averaged 26.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 30.9GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 26.1GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB is 64.7%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Kingston 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 105ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 19.4GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 10 samples)
Min Avg Max
13.7 MC Read 30.9 50.4
9.2 MC Write 22.5 35.3
9.1 MC Mixed 26.1 33.1
75.8% 26.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.3 SC Read 19.4 24.7
4.2 SC Write 22.5 34.4
7.8 SC Mixed 23.7 29.7
62.5% 21.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
80.9 Latency 105 239
38.1% 105 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 33.1
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 29.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 29.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.6
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 25.7
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 23
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 30.2
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 29.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 29.6
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 29.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 29.6
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 28.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 7.8
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,295,516 RAM Kits tested

Typical 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $174

Popular 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback