Today's hottest deals

Emaxx EMX-A320-GAMING +

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEmaxx EMX-A320-GAMING +  (all builds)
MotherboardEMAXX EMX-A320-GAMING +
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 13:05
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$124
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 236
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 310
39% 299 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 65%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$139
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 79.9
Parallax 142
57% 97.3 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 34.6
57% 75.4 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 60 48 59 33 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 416
Write 333
Mixed 327
SusWrite 69.2
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 34.5
124% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 86.7
DQ Mixed 151
122% 178 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
432GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 150 131 149 150 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 143
Write 127
Mixed 31
SusWrite 146
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 33.1
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 29.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-A320-GAMING + Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Emaxx EMX-A320-GAMING +

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback