PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VG4 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130712 |
Uptime | 2.5 Days |
Run Date | Aug 02 '18 at 08:46 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
65%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 99 111 107 97 MB/s
|
63.5%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
155GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 78 77 78 78 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
222GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 118 115 119 118 MB/s
|
70.7%
Very good
|
|||
Maxell HDD 500GB
183GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905584-032.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 70x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 50x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 25x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 27x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $146 |