Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A7 V12.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V12.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V12.1
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 07:07
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 56
2-Core 126
44% 78 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 210
24% 186 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8478
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 5.8
4% 27.8 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 6.6
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 122 98 97 85 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 913
Write 219
Mixed 261
SusWrite 99.8
81% 373 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 32.7
101% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 151
122% 176 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 169%
Maxell HDD 500GB
179GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 24 28 27 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 21.4
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 22.8
30% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V12.1 Builds (Compare 340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V12.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback