Sun SUN FIRE X4450

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSun SUN FIRE X4450  (all builds)
MotherboardSun SUN FIRE X4450
Memory101.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101117
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 08 '18 at 19:33
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7450
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 39.8
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 67.8
29% 47.3 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 276
24% 207 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 1TB
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 54 55 55 52 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 107%
Adaptec Array 293GB
221GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 54 55 55 53 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 51%
Adaptec Array 147GB
131GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 52 53 54 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 54%
Synology iSCSI Storage 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 50 46 46 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.5% Poor
Read 97.8
Write 94.7
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 49.2
19% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 13.9
51% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 85.6
DQ Write 95.1
DQ Mixed 90.8
68% 90.5 MB/s
Synology iSCSI Storage 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 63 67 66 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
Read 86.8
Write 103
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 63.3
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.83 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M395T5160QZ4-CE66 32x4GB
32 of 32 slots used
128GB FB-DIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback