Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime25.5 Days
Run DateAug 08 '18 at 22:07
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 253
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 759
78% 631 Pts
64-Core 993
62% 993 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2790 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 161
Parallax 139
124% 151 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 148
Splatting 118
106% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 115%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,736
Write 5,483
Mixed 5,448
1,241% 5,555 MB/s
4K Read 652
4K Write 331
4K Mixed 420
1,702% 468 MB/s
DQ Read 1,273
DQ Write 994
DQ Mixed 1,066
816% 1,111 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
337GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 489 489 489 489 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 490
Mixed 404
SusWrite 490
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 67.4
227% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 137%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
836GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 171 174 174 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 174
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 173
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
782GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 86 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 83
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 87.6
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X4GD3000C15K4 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 37.8
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 20.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $686
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback