Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime19.8 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 17:45
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 146
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 204
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 68.7
59% 70.6 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 69.7
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 24 21 16 4.4 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 400
Write 291
Mixed 301
SusWrite 31.6
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 25.5
98% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 75
DQ Mixed 19.9
50% 109 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 100%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
31GB free
Firmware: 580A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 70 73 70 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 212
Write 112
Mixed 165
SusWrite 73.2
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 26.2
99% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 85.8
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 96.3
75% 101 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
485GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 115 114 116 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 73
SusWrite 115
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
190GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43% Average
Read 78
Write 70.3
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 71.5
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-10666CL9-2GBRL 04CD F3-10666CL9-2GBRL 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.6% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback