Today's hottest deals

HP Presario CQ56 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Presario CQ56 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1604
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '18 at 11:20
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P320-$20
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 65
1-Core 30.1
2-Core 63.2
36% 52.8 Pts
4-Core 62.3
8-Core 64.2
8% 63.2 Pts
64-Core 64.1
4% 64.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 1604) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.79 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 78 80 80 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 87
Write 88.1
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 79.6
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Presario CQ56 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ56 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback