MSI X99S XPOWER AC (MS-7881)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7881
MotherboardMSI X99S XPOWER AC (MS-7881)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime25.2 Days
Run DateSep 24 '18 at 22:59
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 117
2-Core 229
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 701
68% 562 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Asus(1043 859F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 114
Parallax 96.4
87% 106 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 98.9
Splatting 110
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$197
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,909
Write 1,068
Mixed 624
262% 1200 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 55.9
201% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 783
DQ Write 572
DQ Mixed 695
515% 684 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 302%
Crucial M500 960GB-$59
18GB free
Firmware: MU05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 412
Write 398
Mixed 309
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 32
120% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 182
174% 273 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 101%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$128
10GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 67.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 70.2
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB
20GB free
Firmware: A4GNW91X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 63 64 73 73 73 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 45
Write 67
Mixed 45
SusWrite 68.8
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 110%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$128
7GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 85 85 87 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 80.5
Write 69.3
Mixed 11
SusWrite 85.2
44% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 92%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$128
26GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 80 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 85.5
Write 84.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 83.9
50% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB
9GB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 115 112 109 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 112
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDN721010ALE604 10TB
11GB free
Firmware: 83XN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 73 71 77 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 65.8
Write 69.5
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 74.2
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.4
320% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAD BLS8G4D240FSC.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAD BLS8G4D240FSC.16FAR 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 40.2
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 22.4
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S XPOWER AC (MS-7881) Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X99S XPOWER AC (MS-7881) - $406

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,035
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback