MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7978
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151218
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 06 '18 at 17:25
Run Duration649 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 738
72% 589 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 60.8
52% 63.8 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 53.3
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 84 92 50 76 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.7% Good
Read 255
Write 208
Mixed 248
SusWrite 79.7
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 38.2
140% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 39.1
40% 62 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 89%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
116GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 81 82 81 80 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 72
Write 66.8
Mixed 51
SusWrite 79.5
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 96 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 90.2
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 93.7
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 84%
WDC WD64 01AALS-00L3B2 640GB
45GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.6% Below average
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 69.4
123% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
69GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 16 21 11 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.8% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 8.5
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 13.9
20% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 8.8%
Great: 44%
WDC WD64 00BEVT-22A0RT0 640GB
55GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 30 31 32 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 26.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 30.6
38% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 4TB
150GB free, PID 01f7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 128 129 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 122
Write 127
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 126
148% 110 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
134% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 80%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 3TB
167GB free, PID 01f7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 172 172 175 184 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 161
Write 156
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 172
175% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 76%
ST500LM0 00-1EJ162 500GB
127GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
Read 112
Write 85
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 69.5
108% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 25.1
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) Builds (Compare 2,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback