Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843B
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 15 '18 at 10:53
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 648
66% 536 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
HP(103C 841E) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 19.6
13% 20.8 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 21.8
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 156 162 151 161 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 144
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 157
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST380013AS 80GB-$75
67GB free
Firmware: 8.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 47
Write 54.8
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 51.7
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 32%
Lexar microSD RDR 129GB
106GB free, PID b051
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 19 17 20 18 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 17.5
14% 9.68 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 24.3
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx Builds (Compare 2,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback