Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 213B
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 13:24
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.1% Poor
Memory 29.3
1-Core 23
2-Core 41.1
20% 31.1 Pts
4-Core 87
8-Core 88.4
12% 87.7 Pts
64-Core 88.3
6% 88.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
HP(103C 213B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 2.41
0% 1.92 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 1.47
Splatting 2.83
2% 2.24 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 82 93 84 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 82.5
Write 98.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 87.9
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 259
15% 259 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback