Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151224
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '18 at 11:57
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka) 8,083 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Memory 22.1 1-Core 61 2-Core 102 33% 61.7 Pts	4-Core 99.1 8-Core 102 13% 101 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Sapphire(174B 2015) CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24% Poor	Lighting 29 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 34.5 24% 31.3 fps	MRender 27.9 Gravity 23 Splatting 36.8 25% 29.2 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 142 131 132 121 138 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.9% Below average	Read 278 Write 162 Mixed 180 SusWrite 128 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 10.6 63% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 84.1 DQ Mixed 15.3 23% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 72%
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32 6,007 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 149GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 65 66 66 68 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 68.8 Write 11.8 Mixed 30.3 SusWrite 65.6 32% 44.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 41%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 17 15 9.9 9.3 19 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 88.3 Write 32.6 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 14.1 47% 42.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 85% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0- 2x2GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.8 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 306 13% 306 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	59x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	37x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	26x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	17x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $63Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	8x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	9x
CT102464BD160 2x8GBCrucialBench 39%, 720 samples	9x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	7x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $220