Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 00:51
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 267
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 865
84% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 148
Parallax 139
112% 142 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 133
Splatting 107
95% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,863
Write 1,345
Mixed 435
266% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 43.2
191% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 677
558% 802 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
121GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 139 73 72 90 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 418
Write 302
Mixed 320
SusWrite 144
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 29.8
136% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 164
160% 250 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
397GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 340 101 104 104 179 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.2% Average
Read 204
Write 106
Mixed 93
SusWrite 210
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 14.9
64% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 24.4
DQ Mixed 22.2
17% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
28GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 75.8
Write 72
Mixed 32
SusWrite 75.9
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
115GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 81 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 79.9
105% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 106 107 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 116
Write 96
Mixed 82
SusWrite 106
134% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 Kingston KHX2400C15/16G 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.7% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback