PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 339A |
Memory | 7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121029 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 12 '18 at 19:26 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | MEX-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
71.4%
Very good
|
74% 127 Pts
|
43% 329 Pts
|
22% 353 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
2.04%
Terrible
|
2% 2.28 fps
|
2% 2.55 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston A400 240GB-$28
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 65 7 33 50 51 MB/s
|
43.6%
Average
|
31% 141 MB/s
|
72% 25.3 MB/s
|
69% 109 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
523GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 139 137 139 137 MB/s
|
78.5%
Very good
|
89% 121 MB/s
|
225% 1.63 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Se 3TB (2013)-$145
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 149 149 149 146 MB/s
|
85.7%
Excellent
|
96% 132 MB/s
|
213% 1.8 MB/s
|
|
![]() SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.3 4.3 3.8 4.6 3.8 MB/s
|
7.99%
Terrible
|
12% 12.1 MB/s
|
110% 2.03 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32%
Below average
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
58% 69.1 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 921x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 289x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 207x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 420x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 193x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 130x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |