Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive10.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '16 at 05:17
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 142
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 402
42% 335 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.200.1035.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 24.4
12% 19.9 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 14.1
14% 17 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 2TB
484GB free
Firmware: 2.4. Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 97%
Qemu HARDDISK 52GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.1 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.1% Very poor
Read 132
Write 70.1
Mixed 102
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.23
2% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback