Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '18 at 08:29
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 59
2-Core 110
53% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 325
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.4% Very good
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 112
Parallax 132
66% 109 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 131
Splatting 109
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 256GB
24GB free
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 157 95 118 93 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.3% Average
Read 224
Write 199
Mixed 210
SusWrite 127
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 30.3
94% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 60.8
DQ Mixed 36.8
30% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
491GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 38 35 39 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 150
Write 160
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 39.1
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 109%
Maxtor STM3320620AS 320GB
21GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 37 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
33% Below average
Read 74.3
Write 76.2
Mixed 45
SusWrite 40.5
44% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33%
Great: 44%
WD WD3200AAJB-00J3A0 320GB
60GB free
Firmware: 00.02C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 46 49 48 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 49.5
Write 45.7
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 47.8
33% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 46%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
791GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 71 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 98.8
Write 100
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 72.9
112% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 60%
ST350083 0AS 500GB
465GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 19 19 21 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.7% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 21.2
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 20.9
37% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
WDC WD32 00AAKS-00V1A0 320GB
297GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 20 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.8% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 20
43% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 16.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback