Asrock A790GXH/128M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A790GXH/128M  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090828
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 25 '16 at 22:25
Run Duration340 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 50
16% 36.5 Pts
4-Core 90.2
8-Core 112
13% 101 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 10% Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
Sapphire(174B E146) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 20.8
3% 12.7 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 14.3
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 138
Write 90.6
Mixed 88
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 5.9
43% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 40.1
DQ Mixed 6.98
11% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 61%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
490GB free
Firmware: SC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 65.6
Mixed 33.3
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.22
4K Mixed 0.06
16% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
257GB free
Firmware: SC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 95.9
Write 125
Mixed 123
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.15
62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 100%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
135GB free
Firmware: 01.00101 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 81
Write 101
Mixed 98
71% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.11
30% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 83%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
33GB free
Firmware: 01.00101 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48% Average
Read 93.4
Write 73.6
Mixed 78.7
62% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.39
114% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48%
Great: 83%
WDC WD20 EACS-11BHUB0 2TB
373GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.4% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 21.2
Mixed 22.2
29% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.14
18% 0.28 MB/s
ST350083 0AS 500GB
165GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 26.1
Mixed 20.2
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.24
46% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 7.1
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 571
7% 571 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback