Performance Results


Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 4% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2600 2,255 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Memory 32.6 1-Core 7 2-Core 13.2 14% 17.6 Pts	4-Core 22.5 8-Core 21.7 3% 22.1 Pts	64-Core 22.9 1% 22.9 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 25%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 338D) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1083 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.32% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.38 0% 0.49 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.32% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial C300-MTFDDAK128MAG 128GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0007 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 62 53 51 42 35 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.5% Very poor	Read 146 Write 71.3 Mixed 107 SusWrite 51.6 21% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 4.9 20% 7.27 MB/s	DQ Read 60 DQ Write 47.2 DQ Mixed 59.9 43% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 58%
SD Card 32GB 861 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 30GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 11 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.28% Terrible	Read 13.4 Write 7.5 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 11.4 13% 10 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.7 34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.28% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B2873GB0-CH9 1x1GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1 of 1 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	5.77% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 1.4 5% 1.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 0.1 5% 1.77 GB/s	Latency 240 17% 240 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM