Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$132 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 96.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 247 88% 155 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 669 69% 559 Pts	64-Core 667 41% 667 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% MSI(1462 8A91) CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Lighting 29.1 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 37.1 24% 32 fps	MRender 30.4 Gravity 28.1 Splatting 34 26% 30.8 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 25%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB 13,500 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 35 74 263 81 123 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 786 Write 271 Mixed 228 SusWrite 136 78% 355 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 21.7 111% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 136 125% 186 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 8GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2100, 2100 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 22.1 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 22.4 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 53 76% 53 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	129x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	110x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	104x

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $648