Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca) 2,180 User benchmarks, average bench 34% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	39% Below average	Memory 58.2 1-Core 33.3 2-Core 65.9 34% 52.5 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 118 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0800) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 3.22 2% 3.39 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 2.17 Splatting 3.48 2% 2.95 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 115 83 96 75 94 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.3% Average	Read 206 Write 256 Mixed 223 SusWrite 91.8 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 16.9 66% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 58.3 DQ Mixed 34.5 53% 106 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 8GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 7 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 7.1 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 32%, 12,494 samples	4x
A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 34%, 2,180 samples	2x
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	2x

GPU
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples	4x
Radeon R5 310AMDBench 2%, 301 samples	2x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	2x

SSD
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 95%, 1,318 samples	2x
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	1x

RAM
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 9,029 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	1x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	1x