Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '19 at 05:09
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 3.30GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 199
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 545
58% 462 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 76.1
49% 67.7 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 57
Splatting 54.6
48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$38
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 434 429 408 217 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 427
Mixed 421
SusWrite 355
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 34.5
123% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 276
230% 332 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 123%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 6.5 6.6 6.4 6.5 6.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 6
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 6.6
14% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x384A54463531323634415A2D3147364531 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.8% Very good
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 27.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback