bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 885 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime16 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 09:56
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU #000, 8 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 110
43% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 622
44% 407 Pts
64-Core 623
38% 623 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 134GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 18 28 34 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 604
Write 400
Mixed 499
SusWrite 25.6
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 26.9
101% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 103
101% 162 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Vmware Virtual disk 97GB
20GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 552
Write 565
Mixed 606
129% 574 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 25.9
100% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 54.2
DQ Mixed 121
88% 118 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 85%
Vmware Virtual disk 97GB
47GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 167 166 151 175 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
66% Good
Read 588
Write 543
Mixed 589
SusWrite 168
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 22.3
85% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 207
137% 163 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66%
Great: 85%
Vmware Virtual disk 752GB
200GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 169 166 152 176 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 596
Write 429
Mixed 554
SusWrite 168
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 22.7
88% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 206
137% 163 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 39.1
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 11.8
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 101%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback