bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime17 Days
Run DateApr 30 '19 at 09:29
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.8% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 94.6
43% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 57.4
8-Core 65.1
8% 61.2 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 134GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 167 93 106 122 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 400
Write 209
Mixed 245
SusWrite 114
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 3.9
29% 8.43 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 63.3
DQ Mixed 61.8
55% 85 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
23.5% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 6
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback