bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DB75EN
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121122
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 19 '16 at 11:59
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 86
2-Core 161
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 356
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 840D) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.88
2% 2.45 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
45GB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 76.4
Write 67.1
Mixed 84.4
58% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.31
72% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 128
Write 114
Mixed 121
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.4
113% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-4GIS Hynix DMT351E6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback