Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67GD
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111227
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 21 '19 at 21:43
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 79%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 157
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 254
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 60.3
46% 57.1 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 63.4
54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 89 88 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 238
Write 92.2
Mixed 114
SusWrite 87.8
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 17.9
65% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 59.1
DQ Mixed 59.6
54% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 45%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
364GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 102 105 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 63.2
Write 56.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 103
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.1% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback