Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 22:08
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 71
2-Core 146
60% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 430
38% 321 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 44
Parallax 39.2
38% 43.4 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 35.7
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Reeinno MC20 480GB S6N8
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 240 444 348 329 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 634
Write 388
Mixed 148
SusWrite 265
79% 359 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 21.3
106% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 503
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 52.4
100% 214 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 171%
Corsair Neutron XTi 480GB-$247
107GB free
Firmware: SAFC02.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 413 450 452 457 454 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 262
Mixed 330
SusWrite 429
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 26
117% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 118
124% 206 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 178 177 179 183 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 123
Write 172
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 174
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.9
280% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 92%
General UDisk 8GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.6 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Read 10
Write 7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 6.6
8% 6.53 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMP4GX3M2A160 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ CMP4GX3M2A160 Kingston KHX1866C11D3L 20GB
667, 933, 667, 933 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback